联焰板宽度对单凹腔驻涡燃烧室冷态流场特性影响的试验研究

doi:10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180808

推进技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 2296-2312.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180808

联焰板宽度对单凹腔驻涡燃烧室冷态流场特性影响的试验研究

朱一骁¹,何小民¹,金义¹

南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:朱一骁，博士生，研究领域为推进系统燃烧技术。E-mail：zyx_tvc@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目 KYLX15_0252江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目（KYLX15_0252）。

Experimental Researches on Unburnt Flow Field Performance of a Single-Cavity Trapped Vortex Combustor with Different Width of Radial Strut

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power Systems，College of Energy and Power Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016，China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究联焰板宽度对单凹腔驻涡燃烧室冷态流场特性的影响，设计了一个带扩压器和机匣的单凹腔驻涡燃烧室，并在此基础上通过改变联焰板宽度进行了冷态流场试验。试验在常温常压状态下进行，试验中的主要研究参数如下：在保持联焰板数目不变时，联焰板宽度分别为40mm，30mm，20mm；在改变联焰板数目时，联焰板数目分别为1，3。研究结果表明：在主流中心(PM)截面上，凹腔内存在双涡流动结构，主涡位于凹腔的中间位置，约占凹腔区域面积的80%；副涡位于主涡与主流之间，约占凹腔区域面积的20%。在联焰板中心(PA)截面上，不同的联焰板宽度会形成两种不同的流线形态，当联焰板宽度较宽时，凹腔内为单涡流动结构，仅存在主涡结构，主涡回流气流沿联焰板向火焰筒下壁面流动；当联焰板宽度较窄时，凹腔内为双涡流动结构，主流气流卷入联焰板后。联焰板宽度对流场特性的影响可以总结为：当联焰板宽度减小时，在PM截面上，凹腔副涡涡心位置在轴向上向上游移动，在径向上向主流移动，主流气流向凹腔扩张程度变小；在PA截面上，联焰板后出现主流和旋涡结构。

关键词: 单凹腔驻涡燃烧室;冷态流场特性;试验研究

Abstract: In order to study the unburnt flow field performance of different width of radial strut, a single-cavity trapped vortex combustor with diffuser and casings was designed. Unburnt flow field experiments were carried out by changing the width of radial strut on the combustor. Experiments were accomplished at atmospheric pressure and temperature. The main parameters of the experiments were shown as follows: the width of radial strut was 40mm， 30mm， 20mm， respectively， while the number of radial strut was constant， and the number of radial strut was 1 or 3 while the number of radial strut was changeable. The results showed that on the central section of mainstream (PM), there were two vortices in the cavity. The main vortex was located in the middle of cavity, accounting for about 80% area of cavity, and the secondary vortex was located between the main vortex and mainstream, accounting for about 20% area of cavity. On the central section of radial strut (PA), different width of radial strut would form two different flow structures. When radial strut was wider, the cavity had a single-vortex flow structure, which meant that only the main vortex existed in cavity. The reflux airflow from main vortex flowed along the radial strut to the lower wall of the liner. When the width of radial strut was narrower, the cavity had a double-vortex flow structure, which meant that the mainstream flowed to the area behind the radial strut. The influence of the width of radial strut on the unburnt flow field characteristics could be summarized as follows: when the width of radial strut decreased, in PM plane, the center of secondary vortex moved upward in axial direction, and moved to the mainstream in radial direction. In PA plane, the mainstream and vortex appeared behind the radial strut.

Key words: Single-cavity trapped vortex combustor;Unburnt flow field performance;Experimental research

朱一骁,何小民,金义. 联焰板宽度对单凹腔驻涡燃烧室冷态流场特性影响的试验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(10): 2296-2312.

ZHU Yi-xiao¹,HE Xiao-min¹,JIN Yi¹. Experimental Researches on Unburnt Flow Field Performance of a Single-Cavity Trapped Vortex Combustor with Different Width of Radial Strut[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(10): 2296-2312.

参考文献

[1] Roquemore W M, Shouse D， Burrus D， et al. Trapped Vortex Combustor Concept for Gas Turbine Engines[R]. AIAA2001-0483.
[2] Ezhil Kumar P K， Mishra D P. Numerical Simulation of Cavity Flow Structure in an Axisymmetric Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2012， 21(1): 16-23.
[3] Ezhil Kumar P K， Mishra D P. Combustion Noise Characteristics of an Experimental 2D Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2015， 43: 388-394.
[4] Ezhil Kumar P K， Kumar P， Mishra D P. Experimental Investigation on the Performance Characteristics of a 2D Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2016， 230(10): 1840-1847.
[5] Ezhil Kumar P K， Mishra D P. Flame Stability Characteristics of Two-Dimensional Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Combustion Science and Technology， 2016， 188(8):1283-1302.
[6] Ezhil Kumar P K， Mishra D P. Combustion Characteristics of a Two-Dimensional Twin Cavity Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power， 2017， 139(7): 1-10.
[7] Ezhil Kumar P K， Mishra D P. Numerical Study of Reacting Flow Characteristics of a 2D Twin Cavity Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Combustion Theory and Modelling， 2017， 21(4): 658-676.
[8] 吴泽俊，何小民，洪亮，等. 采用离心喷嘴的单凹腔驻涡燃烧室点火与贫熄特性[J]. 推进技术， 2015， 36(4): 601-607.
[9] 金义. 高油气比驻涡燃烧室流动与燃烧性能研究， [D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学， 2013.
[10] Jin Y， He X M， Jiang B， et al. Effect of Cavity-Injector/Radial-Strut Relative Position on Performance of a Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2014， 32(1): 10-18.
[11] Jin Y， He X M， Zhang J Y， et al. Numerical Investigation on Flow Structures of a Laboratory-Scale Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering， 2014， 66(s1-2: 318-327.
[12] Jin Y， Li Y F， He X M， et al. Experimental Investigations on Flow Field and Combustion Characteristics of a Model Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Applied Energy， 2014， 134: 257-269.
[13] Agarwal K K， Ravikrishna R V. Experimental and Numerical Studies in a Compact Trapped Vortex Combustor: Stability Assessment and Augmentation[J]. Combustion Science and Technology， 2011; 183(12): 1308-1327.
[14] Agarwal K K， Krishna S， Ravikrishna R V. Mixing Enhancement in a Compact Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Combustion Science and Technology， 2013， 185(3): 363-378.
[15] Li M Y， He X M， Zhao Y L， et al. Effect of Strut Length on Combustion Performance of a Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2018， 76:204-216.
[16] Wu Z J， Jin Y， He X M， et al. Experimental and Numerical Studies on a Trapped Vortex Combustor with Different Struts Width[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering， 2015， 91: 91-104.
[17] 何小民，许金生，苏俊卿. 驻涡区进口结构参数影响TVC燃烧性能的试验[J]. 航空动力学报， 2007， 22(11): 1798-1802.
[18] 何小民，张净玉. 驻涡燃烧室燃烧组织方式和设计思路分析[J]. 航空科学技术， 2008， (2): 26-29.
[19] 何小民，许金生，苏俊卿. 驻涡燃烧室燃烧性能试验[J]. 航空动力学报， 2009， 24(2): 318-323.
[20] 金义，何小民，蒋波. 富油燃烧/快速淬熄/贫油燃烧(RQL)工作模式下驻涡燃烧室排放性能试验[J]. 航空动力学报， 2011， 26(5): 1031-1036.
[21] Jin Y， He X M， Zhang J Y， et al. Experimental Study on Emission Performance of an LPP/TVC[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2012， 25(3): 335-341.
[22] Jin Y， He X M， Jiang B， et al. Design and Performance of an Improved Trapped Vortex Combustor[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2012， 25(6): 864-870.

联焰板宽度对单凹腔驻涡燃烧室冷态流场特性影响的试验研究

Experimental Researches on Unburnt Flow Field Performance of a Single-Cavity Trapped Vortex Combustor with Different Width of Radial Strut

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价